Peter’s still building on what has come before it. We ended the last chapter with a reminder of what Jesus has done and what He is now doing (ruling over stuff), and are now presented with Him as an example of suffering. Of course, this order brings the servanthood and suffering of Jesus into stark relief given his true position in the grand scheme of things (compared to us who have no throne to descend from and who ultimately cause most of our own suffering.) In either case, we’re to follow Jesus (as always, that’s more literal than we tend to take. Do the things he did for the people he did in the way he did it.) In this case, we’re potentially suffering at the hands of people who don’t like to hear true things or who don’t like to stop doing things that they enjoy, even though they’re bad for them.
So, we follow Jesus, even in suffering. Doing so is pretty good evidence that you’ve taken up your cross and generally pretty alright on not following human passions (most people don’t consider suffering a passion except…well, nevermind.) I don’t think this sentence is intended to imply folks have stopped sinning completely just because they suffer, I think the gist is that when you’re being selfless and sacrificing for Jesus sin doesn’t present the same level of temptation. Kind of an idle hands kind of thing, just up a couple of notches.
So, we don’t end up living how those who aren’t part of the Kingdom live, no orgies or drinking parties or lawless idolatry. (Note that I gave three things from the list, one of which you know for sure is problematic, one you may not completely understand, and one you may consider a gray area up for debate. Peter doesn’t make those additional qualifications, just for the record.) Not being part of this kind of thing is surprising to those who are doing it but note that ol’ Pete says you still say out of it and that there’s ultimately a right and wrong side of things that that powerful judge of a character from the end of the last chapter will hold them to account.
Theology and Brews debate #3 comes from the gospel being preached to the dead. Although there are other viable options, I most lean on this being a sinner=dead, Kingdom person=living/spirit kind of action. The gospel goes to those who are dead (us, sinful humanity) that they might live (…in the spirit the way God does, ultimately us redeemed in Christ). Other options include Jesus preaching in hell or other types of oddness. Either way, I’m not too concerned that we’re missing the heart of Jesus by not having a firm grasp on what Peter is getting at here.
And in case the preaching to the dead thing doesn’t grab your attention, Peter brings to reminder that the end of all things is at hand. This ties a little into how you may believe Jesus second coming is to occur but I generally read this to be an acknowledgment that all the things that needed to be completed prior to Christ’s return are done. He could show up at any time and close down the whole show. I don’t believe it requires us to think that Peter believed Jesus would return imminently in that time.
Notice, though, that he introduces the fact that the end of all things is at hand just so he can use a “therefore” to tell you how we should live in light of that. The Lord could return at any time so keep it under control, play it cool for the sake of your prayers (so if you can’t keep it cool and don’t know how to treat your wife, Peter basically implies you’re talking to yourself when you’re praying.) Above all of that, love each other, forgive each other, show hospitality to one another without complaining.
The gift thing is kind of interesting, the implication is that your gifts are intended to serve others and it is through those that, at least in part, God’s grace is distributed to the world. When you don’t use your gifts in that way, you’re a poor steward of what the Lord has given you. Dang, fellas. Focus on that over the next few days/weeks. Petition God, see if you can discover anywhere where you are denying grace to the world and being a poor steward of your gifts. They aren’t there to glorify you, that’s for sure. Put them to proper use.
Then back to suffering. Peter expects suffering so much that he posits some kind of Christian doofus who would act surprised that a trial has come upon him (a fiery one at that.) Not only should we expect it, we should rejoice in it! When we share in the same suffering that Jesus did, Peter says the glory of God is revealed. (This is interesting, certainly, in light of Peter’s own death on a cross where he asked to be crucified upside down, not feeling worthy to die in the exact same way as Jesus did.)
Where people insult you, you are blessed. It’s the whole deal, the world is turned upside down. This is no half-in Kingdom, we’re rejecting the way the world thinks and trading it for what Jesus thinks. They insult you, Jesus says it’s a blessing. They call it suffering, you call it glory. I didn’t fully feel the weight of these dichotomies until I began thinking of what I was teaching my children, what I was asking them to do and how to live. I’m teaching them to accept insults from the world, to suffer as need be. It puts the demands of the Kingdom and the fealty to Jesus in the right relief to place those same things onto the heads of your children. It kind of hit me hard at the time in the sense that it became more real to me personally as well.
The Old Testament rounds out the chapter with references from Ezekiel and Malachi, as well as Proverbs. Broad point is that there is a purification within God’s people, a refining. Suffering seems to serve this purpose, in addition to being a good witness to those around us. And they need it, because if the righteous are scarcely saved, what will become of the ungodly and the sinner?